About Us

Name: Patrick Baldwin
Email: pab@tanasarah.com
Name:
Email: tanabaldwin@att.net
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Acting Stupidly

During this press conference last night, President Obama commented on a situation in Cambridge, Massachusetts involving the police and an african american professor. While first saying that he did not know all the facts, he went on to state that the police had acted stupidly. Okay, someone acted stupidly but it wasn't the police officer, it was our brilliant President, who inserted himself in something where he had a lack of information and a bias due to his personal friendship with the professor.
 
Having read the police report on the incident, and watched the video of the incident, I feel the President was way off base in his comments. I will admit that as a former police officer, I have my own bias. However, looking at this as objectively as possible, it seems clear, considering the facts, the President's comments reflect ignorance and arrogance.
 
This police officer, Sergeant Crowley, was dispatched to a possible crime in progress involving a home being broken into. Upon his arrival he speaks with the complainant, then approaches the home. When he makes contact with Mr. Gates, he requests identification so that he can verify that Mr. Gates does belong there. This has to be done, whether Mr. Gates was black, white, asian, etc.. Mr. Gates, rather than being appreciative that someone was keeping an eye on his home, and that the police responded promptly to a possible problem, reacts in the manner of the activist that he is. Mr. Gates berates Sergeant Crowley and accuses him of racism. Mr. Gates was uncooperative and verbally abusive, and continued to escalate his offensive behavior. Sergeant Crowley responded with professionalism, and even after placing Mr. Gates under arrest, continued to treat him with far more courtesy than Mr. Gates was showing the police. If this was your home, wouldn't you want the police to make sure that the person in the house belonged there? This wasn't about race, this was about a home with the front door broken in, people in the house and needing to know if they belonged there.
 
Sergeant Crowley is a veteran police officer, with a distinguished record and no history of racial behavior. On the contrary, he was selected to teach a course at the police academy that dealt with racial profiling and how officers should avoid that type of practice. Years ago, it was James Crowley who responed to fallen Boston Celtics star Reggie Lewis and attempted to revive him by performing CPR. People who know Sergeant Crowley relate that to this day, he still comments on how he wishes he had been able to save Lewis's life. A plethora of people, of differing races, have come forward to defend Sergeant Lewis and paint a picture of a professional and caring officer. This officer is not a racist and did nothing wrong, and yet, with the comments made in support of Mr. Gates, President Obama has damaged Sergeant Crowley's reputation and good name.
 
Police officers have a difficult job, even on the best of days. There is no normal, no routine. People complain that there is never a cop around when you need one, and then complain when a patrol car is in their rear view mirror. Police officers risk their lives every day and believe me, its not for the money, which is not nearly enough, it is because, for the most part, they want to make a difference, make our lives safer and maybe even save a life. Yes, there are bad apples out there, as you find in any occupation, but they are not the majority. We can all "monday morning quarterback", and many of us cops and ex-cops probably have more than most, and see ways in which we might have dealt with this differently. But, we weren't there, we didn't have to make the decision at that moment, Sergeant Crowley did, and I, for one, will give him the benefit of the doubt.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Involuntary Servitude For Our Children

The House of Representatives (HR 1388) and the Senate (S 277) have passed an alarming bill, opening the door to involuntary servitude for our children, which will now be on its way to the President's desk.
 
The Give (HR 1388) and Serve (S 277) Acts deal with the re-authorization and amendment of National Service Bill. While supporters, in the Senate these include Ted Kennedy and John McCain, say that this is merely an extension and strengthening of the Americorps program, this is far from all this legislation covers.
 
Within this bill there is a requirement for the establishment of a commission to determine ways to expand national service programs, including:
 
         "The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service."
 
         " Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds."
 
Yes, you read that right, our government is now moving in the direction of ordering mandatory service for, according to the bill, our children between the ages of 17 and 25. There is also provision in the bill for the possibility of mandatory service for retirement age citizens as well. While the language of the bill does not speak to mandatory military service, there is the open door to include type of domestic defense forces which Obama spoke of in Colorado Springs on July 2, 2008.
 
         "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
 
There is a scary comparison that could be made here, when you consider pressing our youth into service to act as a massive national police force.
 
Also, tucked away inside this bill is this little gem:
 
         "Amendment to prohibit organizations from attempting to influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing."
 
The last time I checked, we had this thing called the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides not only for the abolition of slavery, but also for the outlawing of involuntary servitude.
 
         (Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.)

I would submit that if our children are pressed into mandatory service, this would be an illegal and unconstitutional act. I, for one, would not surrender my children to the government to be sent to their proposed training campuses (originally called camps), for indoctrination prior to assignment. I have served my country, and have also served my community in various volunteer organizations, and did so by my choice, not because I was forced by the government. I never want to see my daughters become the victims of their own government's oppression. Government encouraging its citizens to service is laudable, to mandate this service is unacceptable. The hypocrisy of liberals, who have so long railed against the draft for military service, to now push this plan is beyond belief.

A government that nationalizes banks, champions wage and price controls, seeks the power to seize private businesses that it deems a danger to the ecomony, and proposes mandatory government service for our children, is a goverment that walking the path toward tyranny. We must all be watchful, alert and involved. We must utilize our First Amendment right to free speech to defend against these things that could mortally wound our cherished republic.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

With Friends Like US...........

As the foreign policy direction of the new administration begins to evolve, it begs the question; with friends like US, who needs enemies?
 
The first foreign press interview granted by our new president was not to the British, French, German, Canadian or Israeli press, but to Al-Arabiya. Okay, so maybe he was sincere in just wanting to open a new dialog.
 
The British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, comes to Washington for his first official meeting with Obama. This representative, of a country which is arguably one of our two closest allies, receives a blatant snub. Unlike previous White House meetings, he is ushered in and out rather quickly, with only a brief Q&A session, instead of the joint press conference normally held. There are no normal State functions held, and even Mr. Brown's wife get the casual brush off from our First Lady. When this very apparent snub is addressed by a British reporter to the State Dept., the response is that British are out of line in feeling snubbed, that they aren't special, they are no different that any of the other 190 countries that the government is dealing with.
 
Then, onto our second steadfast friend, Israel. Our esteemed Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, travels to the Middle East. Does she trumpet our support for our Israeli allies, no, the hallmark of her visit is Obama's pledge of $900 million to assist the terrorist Palestinian group, Hamas, with rebuilding Gaza.
 
So, as I am left to understand, the new US foreign policy is to kiss up to hostile Muslim regimes, disrespect the British, and stick a thumb in the eye of Israel. What's next, pull our troops out of South Korea and apologize to Kim Jong Il for standing in his way all these years? Or maybe we can send a nice greeting card and basket of processed uranium to Achmadinejad?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Deja Vu, All Over Again!

As I read the newswires this morning, Yogi Berra's old saying, "It's like deja vu all over again", sprang to mind.
 
President Obama, under a veil of secrecy, sent a letter to Vladimir Putin's puppet, Medvedev, offering to drop our missile defense system plans if the Russians would assist us in preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. This naive quid pro quo offer is absurd on so many levels it is hard to know where to start.
 
This Carteresque bumble at diplomacy makes me think that Obama drank the same Kool-Aid that President Bush did when he ridiculously said he had looked into Putin's eyes and saw a good man. So, we drop the missile shield and trust in the former KGB agent to flip 180 degrees and turn on his long-time pal Achmadinejad? Yeah that's going to happen. The Russians have been working overtime, and making huge money, helping the Iranians along with their nuclear program, which everyone can rest easy and believe is only meant for peaceful energy production. Sure, they are just suddenly going to turn on a dime and walk away from those paydays, especially when they perceive that the United States is willing to negotiate from a position of weakness. We have been here before, facing down thugs who were threatening us and our allies, I know I was there. Didn't we learn anything?
 
Nearly a quarter century ago, while in the Army, I was in Germany and participated in providing security as we deployed Pershing II missiles all over the country. President Reagan took this action, even as he negotiated for a reduction in nuclear arms, because he understood that we could only be successful in dealing with the hard-line Russians when speaking from a position of strength. Obama should take a lesson from this.
 
Not only would we be weakening ourselves, but we would also be throwing Poland, the Czech Republic and our other eastern European allies under the bus. Sending the signal to Putin that we won't take a strong stance, also telegraphs that we may well be willing to allow him to act on his aggressive urges towards all the former Soviet satellite nations. Since suffering no serious repercussions from his incursion into Georgia, he is already emboldened. It is not wise to encourage him further by getting mealy mouthed with a non-starter like Obama's offer. He has bullied Ukraine and Europe this winter with his cutting off of natural gas, and he stuck a thumb in our eye with his pressuring the government of Kyrgyzstan to close our military base there. The Obama-Hillary Clinton foreign policy direction appears to view Putin's intentions as something far different that what it is. Perhaps they should consider what Mikhail Gorbachev has to say, that Putin and his ilk are like the old-school communists of the Soviet era and Putin has designs on recreating what once was. I think we can trust Gorbachev's evaluation on this, he should know better than anyone, he was one of these guys.
 
At a time when we are already economically vulnerable, especially to China, it is lunacy to unilaterally disarm and put ourselves at the mercy of those who have, time and again, proven that they cannot be trusted. This is a pivotal moment in history, Iran and Russia are serious and growing threats. We cannot come to the table softly quoting Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" We must enter the room with Teddy Roosevelt's big stick and we need to make everyone understand that if necessary the stick will be used.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Brilliant first steps.....yah

So, here we are two days into the Barak Obama administration and to be honest, I am less than impressed. I mean, the world hasn't suddenly become peaceful and prosperous because of the ascension of the Obamessiah, no miracles have taken place, the US has not become loved by all around the world, in short, today is not a whole heck of a lot different that Monday was.
 
Okay, dispensing with the crushing disappointment I should be feeling, let's look at the important first steps of our President. First, he rescinded the executive order that Bush had issued in regards to prohibiting tax payer funded foreign aid being used for abortions overseas. Yeah, I can't think of a single thing going on right now that rates up there for me with paying for abortions in other countries, Good call on priority one! Second, Obama signs the order closing Guantanamo within the year and prohibiting many forms of interrogation, Woo Hoo, let's all celebrate another good call there, but ya know, let's just keep this one tucked away in case of another terrorist attack, so we remember exactly who to thank for being soft and making life better for the poor demented killers.
 
Now let's see what's next on the agenda, oh yeah, getting rid of "Don't ask, don't tell". Man, incredible nailing another critical issue facing our nation, at least it must be a critical issue for someone, probably that San Francisco crowd that Obama was sipping wine with and complaining about the rest of us clinging to our guns and God. It's a good thing the economy is doing well, and we have no re-emerging threats from Russia to go along with the on-going issues with Venezuela, Iran and North Korea. We are such a blessed country that our new Great Leader can concentrate on the important things. What's next, well, I am guessing it may be Global Warming, and the Obamessiah will enact the democrats proposal to tax farmers for their cattle farting!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »