About Us

Name: Patrick Baldwin
Email: pab@tanasarah.com
Name:
Email: tanabaldwin@att.net
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Acting Stupidly

During this press conference last night, President Obama commented on a situation in Cambridge, Massachusetts involving the police and an african american professor. While first saying that he did not know all the facts, he went on to state that the police had acted stupidly. Okay, someone acted stupidly but it wasn't the police officer, it was our brilliant President, who inserted himself in something where he had a lack of information and a bias due to his personal friendship with the professor.
 
Having read the police report on the incident, and watched the video of the incident, I feel the President was way off base in his comments. I will admit that as a former police officer, I have my own bias. However, looking at this as objectively as possible, it seems clear, considering the facts, the President's comments reflect ignorance and arrogance.
 
This police officer, Sergeant Crowley, was dispatched to a possible crime in progress involving a home being broken into. Upon his arrival he speaks with the complainant, then approaches the home. When he makes contact with Mr. Gates, he requests identification so that he can verify that Mr. Gates does belong there. This has to be done, whether Mr. Gates was black, white, asian, etc.. Mr. Gates, rather than being appreciative that someone was keeping an eye on his home, and that the police responded promptly to a possible problem, reacts in the manner of the activist that he is. Mr. Gates berates Sergeant Crowley and accuses him of racism. Mr. Gates was uncooperative and verbally abusive, and continued to escalate his offensive behavior. Sergeant Crowley responded with professionalism, and even after placing Mr. Gates under arrest, continued to treat him with far more courtesy than Mr. Gates was showing the police. If this was your home, wouldn't you want the police to make sure that the person in the house belonged there? This wasn't about race, this was about a home with the front door broken in, people in the house and needing to know if they belonged there.
 
Sergeant Crowley is a veteran police officer, with a distinguished record and no history of racial behavior. On the contrary, he was selected to teach a course at the police academy that dealt with racial profiling and how officers should avoid that type of practice. Years ago, it was James Crowley who responed to fallen Boston Celtics star Reggie Lewis and attempted to revive him by performing CPR. People who know Sergeant Crowley relate that to this day, he still comments on how he wishes he had been able to save Lewis's life. A plethora of people, of differing races, have come forward to defend Sergeant Lewis and paint a picture of a professional and caring officer. This officer is not a racist and did nothing wrong, and yet, with the comments made in support of Mr. Gates, President Obama has damaged Sergeant Crowley's reputation and good name.
 
Police officers have a difficult job, even on the best of days. There is no normal, no routine. People complain that there is never a cop around when you need one, and then complain when a patrol car is in their rear view mirror. Police officers risk their lives every day and believe me, its not for the money, which is not nearly enough, it is because, for the most part, they want to make a difference, make our lives safer and maybe even save a life. Yes, there are bad apples out there, as you find in any occupation, but they are not the majority. We can all "monday morning quarterback", and many of us cops and ex-cops probably have more than most, and see ways in which we might have dealt with this differently. But, we weren't there, we didn't have to make the decision at that moment, Sergeant Crowley did, and I, for one, will give him the benefit of the doubt.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The right way, the wrong way, the Obama way!

Is our current foreign policy confusing anyone else, or is it just me? I am trying to figure this out and I must be missing something. The Administration will not strongly speak out and support the protestors in Iran, who, nearly everyone agrees, are correct in asserting that the Iranian presidential election was stolen by Ahmanutjob and the mullah theocrazies. But, spokesmen for Obama were tripping all over themselves to get out there and condemn the government of Honduras for tossing out their dictator wanna-be Zelaya.
 
I guess there is some common ground, being as our government seems to want to support the anti-American factions in both cases. Perhaps we would be better off if the same approach was taken in both cases, try to say little or nothing at all. It appears that this was an easy way to go in the case of Iran, where the government there is clearly in the wrong. The rule must be that we can only shoot our mouths off when the government is right, as in the case of Honduras. Is it really possible that no one in the Administration took the time to do their homework on this? The military only stepped in at the request and with the unanimous backing of the Honduran Supreme Court and Congress. Zelaya, following in the footsteps on Obama friend, Hugo Chavez, tried to go around the Congress, the Honduran Constitution and the Court and push an illegal election meant to put him on the path of a Chavez like presidency for life.
 
So, if I get this right, the US foreign policy now supports the establishment of leftist dictatorships, of fascist theocracies and of oppressing those who call for democracy and freedom. This must be the case, since we are now standing shoulder to shoulder with Castro and Chavez!
 
You know what they say Mr. President, most times, you are judged by the company you keep!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Enough about Lincoln....how about George Washington?

A week ago President's Day came and went, and this year even more than usual, due to his 200th birthday, we were deluged with commentary on how wonderful Abe Lincoln was, and how historians regard him as our greatest president. This coming on the heels of Barak Obama's election and the plethora of comparisons to Obama and Lincoln, it all just makes me scream....Enough already, how about we take some time to remember the man who was our greatest president, George Washington! Let's take just a few moments to compare these men, and see if we can identify who really should be honored on President's Day?
 
Abraham Lincoln has become more myth than reality, a myth who might not be so highly regarded had he not been assassinated. Far from being the poor rail splitter, living in a log cabin, Lincoln was his times equivalent to a corporate lawyer, whose house in Springfield was the first one with indoor plumbing in the city. While we all agree that his actions to end slavery were a good thing, few seem to recall or discuss his statement, "If I could save the union without freeing any slave, I would." When asked why he would not just let the secessionist states go quietly, Lincoln replied, "Then who would pay for the government?" It can certainly be argued, on historical fact, that the Civil War was as much about the federal government gaining control over southern agricultural wealth, as it was about ending slavery.Lincoln suspended habeus corpus and during the war imprisoned hundreds for nothing but dissenting speech. Let us also not forget that it was Lincoln who signed the first income tax into law....and we all know what that has led to. Lincoln was a skilled orator who spoke of important and positive things, while at the same time taking many actions of a far darker nature. Lincoln was not well loved in his time, and it was nearly 20 years after his death before the great myth building began. Had he not met with violence that April night at Ford's Theatre, it is doubtful that this man, who led us into our bloodiest war ever, would have his face on Mt. Rushmore or share a day of honor with Washington!
 
George Washington was not a poor log cabin man, nor a highly trained military genius. He was a working man, a surveyor, who, when he could, was a hands on planter at Mount Vernon. He had suffered losses and victories in the French and Indian War, but he was respected for his service. He was a man who treasured his state of Virginia and who loved the United States of America. He was a patriot, at a time when being a patriot meant far more than today. When he stood as the most recognizable face of our revolution, his patriotism could have cost him his life for treason. While others dithered in endless argument during the War, Washington walked amongst his troops, holding his army together only by his strength of personality. He was on the battlefield, even having a horse shot out from under him, and he fought for our right to self-determination, to free us from unjust taxation and give us our cherished liberty. Washington spoke of the rights of the sovereign states and their power to stand together with a limited federal government. He humbly accepted the presidency, and promised to step down, and did, after two terms, commenting that a president should not be as a King. He was clear in his beliefs that the federal government should not usurp power from the states and that the rights of the individual should be held as most sacred. He was a man humbled by the honor of having the new nation's capital named in his honor. Washington was also the only Founding Father to speak out against and advocate for the abolition of slavery. Though critics point out that he held slaves, his writings reveal that the laws of the time prevented him from outright freeing them without breaking up families, however, he did order, in his will, that his slaves be freed upon the death of his wife and that until that time that they be cared for by his heirs. George Washington was not a complex man with hidden agendas, he was what he has always appeared to be, a patriot and a president whom we should remember with honor.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Change....don't you believe it!

He came to the fork in the road and after careful, ah, consideration, ah, he decided to take the path that was so well travelled that government had raised taxes and paved it!
 
Is it just me or have we reached a point where a third party is not only an attractive idea, but becoming more necessary every day?

First, we have a president who promised us a change, and we just changed back, mainly, to the Clinton administration. We have a Secretary of State with a clear conflict of interest due to her husband's foreign donor ties. We have an Attorney General who signed off on pardons for terrorists. We have a Treasury Secretary who is a tax cheat. We are about to have a HHS Secretary who is a tax cheat. The first Commerce Secretary nominee had to withdraw due to being a target of a criminal investigation, and the Deputy Defense Secretary was the leading defense industry lobbyist. If a conservative president had made these appointments he would have already been tarred and feathered by the media. But since these people were nominated by Obama, they are simply allowed to say, "I'm sorry", and all is forgiven. I really don't think that President Obama should spout any more statements about ethics in government.
 
Second, take a look at the Congress. The House Democrats have crafted a "porkulus" plan to save the economy, but of $825 billion the Congressional Budget Office finds that only 12 cents out of every dollar actually has anything to do with stimulus. The rest are a slew of projects that address nearly every liberal dream project of the last 40 years. House Republicans should be congratulated for standing together, along with a handful of Democrats, to oppose this insane bill. However, before you applaud too loudly, keep in mind that they weren't given a chance to participate in writing the bill and therefore weren't able to add any of their boondoggles in, and being as there was no chance of the bill failing, it made it real easy to vote against it.
 
Even if you give the House Republicans a big hand for opposing this monster, don't get carried away the Senate has yet to act. While there was initially some hope that Senate Republicans would stand firm against the "porkulus" bill, and therefore hold the line that 68% of Americans want held, it now becomes clear that they are only really playing hard ball so that they can get input, and word comes out that their plan comes it at more than $900 billion! They want to protect us from waste so much that they are willing to spend even more of our children's money to do it!
 
So, Democrats and Republicans alike are proposing a "stimulus" plan (see above for true term) that does little to grow our economy, and truly only grows two things, the size of government and the debt that our children and grandchildren will be saddled with. If this doesn't illustrate the need for a new third party, I don't know what does. We need elected representatives who will serve the people, the people and not the government. We need smaller government, lower taxes, more personal freedom. That would be a change we could and should believe in and hunger for!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Bold Choice

John McCain made what I have to say was a bold choice in picking Governor Sarah Palin for his running mate. This move got me back on board the Straight Talk Express after months of standing on the sidelines. I spent the last few months looking hard at the plethora of possibilities for the Vice Presidential slot, and after much review, I found myself most able to support Governor Palin. Sarah Palin has what the Republican party needs. She is young, intelligent, plain spoken, honest, strong in her beliefs, and not afraid to make tough decisions. She, like McCain is a maverick, not afaid to go her own way, if she believes that is what is best for the people.
 
If people will just take a little time to get to know Sarah Palin, I think everyone, who is open and honest, should be able to see that she was not just chosen because she is a woman. This woman was chosen because of what she believes and the type of leader she is, and I believe, will be. Senator McCain's choice of Governor Palin goes beyond just a running mate, it is a move to transfer the leadership of the Republican Party to the next generation, the Sarah Palin's, Bobby Jindahl's, etc. This election will allow us to, at this critical time, to have a strong leader as Commander in Chief during these next few difficult years, with a strong future leader at his side.
 
Let's support the Bold Choice, Let's support McCain/Palin
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »